It’s a New Day
From a former FAA chief counsel, a glimpse of aviation in the aftermath
By J.E. ’Sandy’ Murdock, Partner, Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge
November/December 2001
Many in industry know Sandy Murdock as a man who speaks his mind, outside of his daily aviation law practice. He has frequently called upon industry and Washington to think out of the traditional box that is aviation. AIRPORT BUSINESS asked Murdock to offer his thoughts following the tragic events that have brought to the forefront the threat of terrorism. Here are his comments.
• Ask not what your country can do
for you, ask now what you can do for your country. — JFK, 1960
• Ask not what your FAA requires of
you, ask now what you can do for aviation.
After September 11, 2001, mere compliance
with the Federal Aviation Regulations is no longer an acceptable standard.
Clearly, each of us must seek to exceed those standards.
Historically, paper compliance with the
FARs would have satisfied your company, your customers, and the government.
Crossing t’s and dotting i’s would protect you from enforcement
actions. Today, that is not enough.
A New Daily Life
More is expected of all of aviation by the
public — traveling or not. Each and every person in aviation, from
the most senior executive to the most junior ramp person, must incorporate
in his or her daily routine and procedure a constant passion for security.
This attitude exceeds compliance; it goes beyond that level to new realms.
Things like ...
• Vigilance on the ramp
Have you seen that person before? If not,
does (s)he have the correct badge?
Is someone performing a function in a non-routine
way, steps out of sequence, confusion about where or when something should
be done?
Question, challenge, observe; examine what
is going on. Feel free to report suspicious activities; make mental notes
of what is unusual.
• Constant assessment in the SIDA or
sterile area
Check to see if that security door is really
closed. Praise the security staff when they carefully search your bags.
Be supportive of the new procedures when standing in a long line. Observe
weaknesses in the system —blind spots, opportunities for human failure,
procedures that require reinforcement. Do not be bashful in making suggestions.
Think outside of the box everywhere. When
you identify a threat, suggest a solution and support final closure.
At a fixed base operation, suggest procedures
that will enhance security, even though no Part 107, 108, 121, or 135
regulation applies. See if some of the procedures can be voluntarily implemented
in your context.
Think security. Would the addition of a
fence or a spotlight add to the airfield’s or hangar’s security?
If yes, try to get such improvements implemented.
If you’re aware of some technology
that may incrementally add to security performance, tell someone in your
office, at the airport, or in the government about how the new approach
can help.
Examine threat paths specifically through
your company. Identify methods that are likely to interdict an intrusion.
Adopt appropriate countermeasures; if they make sense, and even if they
exceed the FAR requirements, do it. Enhanced security will be a measure
on which customers will make future selection of your company over others.
Identify the same points of weakness on
a macro basis. Define solutions or responses. Implement them and share
them with your trade association. Urge them to establish industry-wide
guidance.
A New Business Model
Old business practices are no longer relevant.
The threat paradigm has changed. Study your business with the horrible,
new model in mind. Try to establish new mechanisms that will address the
new tools of terrorism.
Customers are no longer likely to accept
old practices and procedures as adequate. As in the past, customers will
carefully examine your safety record and now will treat your security
performance as an equal or greater differentiator. To the extent that
an FBO (or any airport business) has adopted a 100 percent search of all
bags, a 100 percent screening of all passengers, and a 100 percent review
of all employee backgrounds, the customer will likely choose the company
over a competitor.
Everyone in aviation has been taught from
the outset that safety is the number one priority. The priority associated
with safety consciousness cannot be diminished, and now there must be
an equal vigilance to security. Everyone should be encouraged to attack
this new threat. Performance evaluations should reward innovation and
discourage performance at a level below 100 percent.
Public confidence in aviation must be restored
in the short term. While the time pressure to meet that goal is severe,
the race is not a sprint. Each of us must be ready for a marathon performance
— more than 25.2 miles — it is a lifelong goal. Every day we
need to seek to increase the level of security in a relevant, productive
fashion. Every day we must ask now how we can do more for aviation security
and safety.