Today, a government-industry rulemaking committee responsible for making recommendations to address the lack of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulatory interpretation consistency issued its final report to the agency.
In late April 2012, the FAA established the Consistency of Regulatory Interpretation (CRI) Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC), as directed by Congress, to review the October 2010 report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) on certification and approval processes (GAO-11-14) and develop recommendations to address the findings in the report.
After a comprehensive review, the CRI ARC concluded that to achieve any type of standardization of regulatory interpretations the FAA’s Flight Standards Service (AFS) and Aircraft Certification Service (AIR) should “review all guidance documents and interpretations to identify and cancel outdated material and cross-reference (electronically link) material to its applicable rule. Further, the CRI ARC recommends the FAA expand its current Aviation Safety Information Management System (AVSIMS) initiative to consolidate the service organization-level libraries into a single AVS master electronic database resource, organized by rule, to allow agency and industry users access to relevant rules and all active and superseded guidance material and related documents.”
The CRI ARC report addresses several other recommendations that are predicated on the success of the development of one master electronic database, including the creation of a Regulatory Consistency Communications Board (RCCB) that would provide clarification to FAA personnel and certificate/approval holders and applicants on questions related to the application of regulations.
“It was clear from the beginning of the ARC’s exhaustive review that standardization cannot be achieved unless the FAA and industry are singing off the same sheet of music,” stated Eric R. Byer, National Air Transportation Association vice president of government and industry affairs and CRI ARC industry chair. “We firmly believe that consolidation of all guidance documents and interpretations that are then organized by rule and housed in one electronic database is the linchpin to any success in resolving the lack of standardization of regulatory interpretations.”
The CRI ARC’s final report now heads to the FAA for its review and then final transmission to Congress in early 2013.
# # #
NATA, the voice of aviation business, is the public policy group representing the interests of aviation businesses before the Congress and federal agencies.
A government-industry rulemaking committee responsible for making recommendations to address the lack of consistency in regulatory interpretations issued its final report to the FAA.
The CRI ARC noted that the proliferation of OpSpecs changes creates inconsistent application and confusion among operators.
ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA – The Consistency of Regulatory Interpretation Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) , an advisory group of aviation stakeholders working with the Federal Aviation Administration...