Department of Transportation Praises U.S. Court of Appeals Decision to Uphold Airline Passenger Protections
The court ruled that it was reasonable for DOT to require airlines to add government fees and taxes to the base fare and disclose these together as a total price, prominently displayed to prevent confusion over the total cost of their travel.
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood praised today’s ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in favor of the U.S. Department of Transportation in Spirit Airlines, Inc. v. United States Department of Transportation. Spirit Airlines, Allegiant Air, and Southwest Airlines challenged portions of the Department of Transportation’s April 2011 air passenger consumer protection rule requiring airlines and ticket agents to include all mandatory taxes and fees in published airfares, hold a reservation without payment or penalty for 24 hours after the reservation is made, and prohibit post purchase baggage price increases after the initial ticket sale.
“Airline passengers have the right to all necessary information when choosing their flights so that they can make the most informed decisions to fit their needs,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “Today’s decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals strengthens our effort to help air travelers receive the respect they deserve.”
The court ruled that it was reasonable for DOT to require airlines to add government fees and taxes to the base fare and disclose these together as a total price, prominently displayed to prevent confusion over the total cost of their travel. As the court noted: ”Based on common sense and over three decades of experience and complaints, DOT concluded that it was deceitful and misleading when the most prominent price listed by an airline was anything other than the total final price of air travel.”
Further, the court concluded that the rule properly regulates airline cancellation policies because existing airline cancellation and refund practices were deceptive and unfair, and that the regulation was “plainly allowed” under DOT’s statute that targets unfair and deceptive practices. Finally, the court ruled that it was reasonable for DOT to conclude that increasing the prices for baggage after the purchase of a ticket amounts to an unfair consumer practice.
The new requirements are among the final provisions from DOT’s most recent airline consumer rule. DOT is looking at other airline consumer protection measures for a possible future rulemaking, including requiring that all airline optional fees be disclosed wherever consumers can book a flight, strengthening disclosure of code-share flights, and requiring additional carriers to file on-time performance reports.
Do you recommend this Press Release?
We Recommend
-
Press Release
Continental, US Airways Fined for Violating DOT Price Advertising Rules
DOT requires any advertising that includes a price for air transportation to state the full price to be paid by the consumer, including all carrier-imposed surcharges.
-
Press Release
DOT Fines Air Canada for Violating Price Advertising Rules
The Department’s Aviation Enforcement Office found that Air Canada, for a period of time in early 2011, displayed advertisements on its websites that did not disclose the amount of taxes and fees...
-
Press Release
DOT Fines Travelocity for Violating DOT Price Advertising Rule
It was fined for violating the Department's rule on full-fare advertising by failing to include fuel surcharges and other fees in advertised airfares and ordered it to cease and desist from further...
-
Press Release
Airline Consumer Protection Rules Take Effect Tomorrow
Under the new rule, U.S. airlines operating domestic flights may not permit an aircraft to remain on the tarmac at large and medium hub airports for more than three hours without deplaning passengers...






