New Cargo Security Rules Seen as Threat to Community Airports

March 1, 2007
A major sticking point is lack of sufficient infrastructure at many airports to satisfy the proposed rules, both in terms of operator and airport personnel and facilities.

At a time when Congressional legislators are already grousing about loss

of service to small communities, the new Twelve-Five Standard Security Program

(TFSSP) could further erode small community air service and "cause chaos in the

air feeder cargo industry."

A major sticking point is lack of sufficient infrastructure at many

airports to satisfy this version (and the previous version) of the TFSSP airport

security requirements, both in terms of operator and airport personnel and

facilities.

The Regional Air Cargo Carriers Association (RACCA) requested that the

U.S. Transportation Security Administration (TSA) postpone, for 90 days, the

implementation date of the most recent TFSSP revision, pending further review

and consideration of comments by TFSSP operators.

RACCA wants the proposed cargo security regulations revised to reflect

the difficulties of staffing, communications capabilities and infrastructure at

many airports which are not staffed full time and where the only two people to

show up at the airport all day is the UPS, DHL or FedEx driver and the landing

pilot. RACCA is currently working with TSA to try to iron out the problems.

"Our association has repeatedly offered to work directly with TSA so that

the framers of that document will better understand our operating environment,

and can develop policies and procedures that satisfy TSA security requirements

and at the same time be practicable for the TFSSP operators," said John W.

Hazlet, Jr., vice president of technical affairs for the organization. "We

reiterate that offer, and emphasize that such input from RACCA and other

stakeholder associations would be a major step forward in developing a mutually

acceptable TFSSP document."

While the latest revision reflects some concerns of cargo operators, it

retains other aspects that remain "difficult, impractical or impossible to do."

RACCA said, if those provisions remain, operators will likely have no choice but

to terminate services to numerous small rural airports, restrict service

features or areas as economically unfeasible or be in violation of the TFSSP's

requirements.

RACCA members are not the only ones concerned about the proposed airport

security regulations. On-demand operators and charter companies also oppose the

proposals, which were originally crafted with little participation of those

segments of the cargo and passenger aviation industry.

For the most part, the programs were based on those applicable to large

cargo and passenger operators, and did not account for the unique

characteristics of smaller operators.

One operator indicated that TSA is now realizing the proposed regulations

did not account for the diversity of passenger and cargo operators and is now

trying to reach out to that segment of the industry.