On its website, Ryanair advertises flights "from 38 cents" to an airport near Stockholm from London. In smaller print, Ryanair says its prices are exclusive of taxes, fees, and charges that would not exceed $26.
Ace suit dismissed
An antiscalping lawsuit against ticket reseller Ace Ticket Worldwide was dismissed last week in bizarre fashion.
Just before a judge was scheduled to hear arguments, the parties agreed to dismiss the case. Douglas Brooks, the lawyer who was suing Ace, said he decided to drop the litigation after concluding the ticket reseller was correct in asserting that the state's antiscalping law doesn't cover events in Boston.
Brooks also said his plaintiff, David Kurzman of Sharon, wanted off the case because he had received threatening telephone calls. Brooks said he had another plaintiff lined up but ultimately decided the case wasn't worth pursuing.
"We concluded, at least for Boston events, that the case lacked merit," Brooks said. "The statutes are sort of a mess."
Kurzman sued Ace in November for charging him $375 for a Red Sox ticket with a face value of $40. The state's antiscalping law limits any markup on the resale of tickets to $2, plus certain service charges.
Ace subsequently argued that the antiscalping statute applies only to events licensed under a specific section of the state law. Ace said all events held in Boston, including Red Sox, Bruins, and Celtics games, are licensed by the city under a separate statute, and therefore exempt from the antiscalping law.
Brooks declined to comment on the nature of the threatening phone calls and Kurzman could not be reached for comment. No affidavit was filed with the court about the threatening phone calls. Officials at Ace said they had no knowledge of any threats.
"I'm thrilled with this victory," said Ace's Jim Holzman. "Ace Ticket continues to provide outstanding service to our customers."
Bruce Mohl can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Airfares nationwide recently hit their highest levels since just before the 2001 terrorist attacks, reflecting hefty fuel prices and strong consumer demand.
It was fined for violating the Department's rule on full-fare advertising by failing to include fuel surcharges and other fees in advertised airfares and ordered it to cease and desist from further...
The DOT concluded there is no need to change the current airline fare practices because they protect consumers and helps them compare prices.