Mar. 18--More than three years before the public knew about it, business lobbyists were drafting a bill to create a regional airport authority that would take control of Mitchell International Airport away from Milwaukee County government.
And a key priority in those behind-the-scenes talks was ensuring that neither the County Board nor county voters would have a say in the handover.
One reason for cutting supervisors out of the action -- and barring the governor and Milwaukee County executive from appointing any elected officials to the authority's seven-member board -- was business leaders' fear that elected officials would block future airport expansion that would likely require buying and bulldozing nearhomes.
Those details about the failed legislation emerged from e-mails and documents released Supervisor Richard D. Nyklewicz Jr. -- after he filed open-records requests to get them -- and from interviews.
State Rep. Jeff Stone (R-Greendale), Sen. Jeff Plale (D-South Milwaukee) and Rep. Mark Honadel (R-South Milwaukee) announced plans in December for a bill to create an airport authority funded user fees, with no taxing power. But the bill's language didn't become public until it was introduced March 3 -- just four days before a public hearing.
The Assembly's Urban and Local Affairs Committee didn't vote on the bill, effectively shelving it for the year. Stone says he plans to bring it back in the next session.
Business interests, led the Greater Milwaukee Committee and the Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce, have long pushed for the airport authority. They say airport officials could act faster outside the county bureaucracy, and that one county shouldn't have sole control over such a major regional economic asset.
Nyklewicz, whose district includes the airport, joined most other county supervisors in arguing that the county should not lose control of an airport it has managed well.
Expansion opposition feared
MMAC Vice President Pete Beitzel said he agreed that the county was doing a good job now, but he was concerned about future leaders. He pointed to a time in the 1980s when supervisors representing districts near the airport controlled four of seven seats on the board's transportation committee, with the late Supervisor Daniel Cupertino Jr. holding the chairmanship.
"He made a statement that 'Over my dead body is there going to be another runway,' " Beitzel said of Cupertino, who represented Milwaukee's Bay View neighborhood and St. Francis. "If the (future) committee decides it doesn't want anything to do with airport expansion, the region is screwed."
Beitzel described the airport as "probably the most important economic development asset in the state" and noted that 60% of its users live outside Milwaukee County. He said Mitchell's future growth should not be decided "the parochial interests of people who have every right to have a representative, but not to control the airport."
Those same concerns were "absolutely" the reason why the legislation banned elected officials from the airport authority's board, Beitzel said.
Supervisor James White, the current chairman of the County Board's Transportation, Public Works and Transit Committee, called the move to take the airport away from the county without a County Board vote or a referendum "the most anti-democratic proposal that has come through here in a long time."
Stone said he understood the expansion concern but was more focused on governing the airport "in a more modern way." He said future versions of the legislation might remove the ban on elected officials.
As early as 2002, airport authority supporters had given up hope of persuading the County Board to agree to the authority, documents show.
On March 4 of that year, Richard Weiss, an attorney at Foley & Lardner, sent MMAC President Tim Sheehy his draft of a bill to create an airport authority, and asked for Sheehy's comments.
A public brawl has erupted over control of Wisconsin's busiest airfield: Milwaukee's Mitchell International Airport.
Spinning off Mitchell Int'l Airport to a regional authority has long been a priority of local business leaders, who say Mitchell is a regional economic asset, not just a county service.
The idea faces significant legal and political hurdles, but little-used federal legislation provides an opening for local governments to experiment with airport privatization
The idea of mixing Timmerman's small propeller planes with Mitchell's jet airliners was swiftly shot down by the county airport chief.