Little Thun Field Makes a Living

Thun Field has managed to avoid the major financial problems and neighborhood issues that have made other Puget Sound-area airports such financial pariahs.


Local governments have never relished the job of owning and operating general-aviation airports. Those airports have a well-deserved reputation as money pits.

They demand specialized expertise to operate successfully, and the air traffic they support creates political problems for elected officials who are the target of complaints about noise, safety risks and vehicular traffic.

Those concerns are why in recent weeks two Puget Sound-area governments, the City of Tacoma and King County, have almost gleefully announced preliminary deals to get out of the airport business. Tacoma is negotiating with a private party to lease Tacoma Narrows Airport, a chronically money-losing operation across the Narrows from the city. And King County has announced a draft agreement with the Port of Seattle to trade King County International Airport, better known as Boeing Field, to the port in exchange for a railroad right of way that it wants to convert to a trail on Lake Washington's eastern shore. The Port of Seattle operates Sea-Tac Airport.

But Pierce County is an exception to that trend. Its modest-sized general-aviation airport, Thun Field on South Hill near Puyallup, has managed to avoid the major financial problems and neighborhood issues that have made other airports such financial pariahs.

Before coming to Pierce County, airport administrator Michael Esher had worked as a deputy director of the Kansas City International Airport and then in Alaska Airlines' airports and properties division.

Esher recently talked with The News Tribune about Thun Field and its prospects for the future.

Tacoma Narrows Airport cost the City of Tacoma about $500,000 a year in losses. What's the financial picture at Thun Field?

Our margins are very thin now. We're in the black, but barely. That lets you pay your bills on a day-to-day basis but what it doesn't give you is the capital resources to improve your facilities. You can fix the garage door, but you can't put on a new roof.

The area near Thun Field is a hotbed of commercial and retail development. With such close neighbors, is noise a major issue?

I don't want to minimize the noise issue. The words "noise" and "airport" are synonymous. I don't consider it to be a significant issue here. We do a lot on campus to make pilots aware of the departure and approach routes that are less disruptive to the neighbors. We recently developed this information brochure to go into the pilots' handbook.

To me the bigger issue is that we have some expensive development locating in this area, so what I'm focusing on in this business plan is that the facilities out here are dated. What I want to be sure is that the facilities are as good as the neighbors expect them to be. I have a big push on to renovate the county-owned hangars. I'm negotiating with a retail developer who is building west of the airport. What people will see when they enter this retail development by one entrance are buildings that are not of the caliber that I would like.

What's the plan to generate more money to fund those improvements?

There are two sides to every airport - the land side and the air side. The FAA grants money for air-side improvements. If you look at our airfield, the paving is in really good shape, the lighting is good, we've got a new weather station and we bought some property to clear obstructions. They don't fund land-side improvements. So what you have to do is lease out the land-side property at a price that generates enough money to fund improvements.

What sort of tenants are you looking for to lease land and facilities adjacent to the airport?

This content continues onto the next page...

We Recommend