Comparison of House and Senate Homeland Security bills

A comparison of provisions in the homeland security bills passed by the House and Senate and the Bush's administration position on them:


_Grants collective bargaining rights and whistleblower protection to airport screeners.

_Requires 100 percent screening of all U.S.-bound cargo in foreign ports for radiation within 5 years.

_Requires 100 percent inspection of all cargo loaded onto U.S. passenger aircraft for explosives.

_Funds three grant programs, each with guaranteed minimums for each state of 0.25 percent of total. Border states would be guaranteed 0.45 percent. No total amount designated in bill.

_Additional grant program created to improve emergency communications systems, no total amount specified.

_Gives more independence to the Privacy and Civil Liberties Board, requiring Senate confirmation of its members and granting it subpoena powers.


_Grants bargaining rights to screeners on non-pay issues and whistleblower protection; gives the Homeland Security Department broad authority to reassign screeners.

_No provision for cargo screening in foreign ports.

_Requires cargo loaded onto passenger aircraft to be subjected to screening comparable to that of checked bags.

_Creates similar grant programs as the House, but guarantees each state a minimum of 0.45 percent share of the total $3.1 billion in each of the next three years

_Creates an emergency communications grant program, authorizing $3.3 billion over the next five years.

_Gives more independence, but less than the House bill, to Privacy and Civil Liberties Board; would allow the board to ask the attorney general to issue subpoenas.


_Opposes collective bargaining rights for airport screeners; advisers would recommend President Bush veto a bill that includes it.

_Opposes 100 percent screening of U.S.-bound cargo in foreign ports, claiming it is too costly and could slow international trade.

_Opposes full inspection of all cargo loaded onto passenger aircraft; wants more flexibility for screeners.

_Prefers House formula that distributes grants on the basis of risk of and vulnerability to terrorism attack.

_Does not believe new program is needed for emergency communication systems.

_Oposes any more autonomy for Privacy and Civil Liberties Board as an encroachment on executive power.


The House bill is H.R. 1; the Senate bill is S.4

On the Net:


Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

News stories provided by third parties are not edited by "Site Publication" staff. For suggestions and comments, please click the Contact link at the bottom of this page.