Florida Home Sellers Can Conceal Proximity to Airport

"You shouldn't have to disclose the proximity to the airport. It's obvious," said Bill Frondorf, a committee member who is also a real estate agent. "Where do you draw the line?"


Homeowners around Witham Field should not have to tell prospective buyers of their homes that they live near the airport, the Martin County Noise Advisory Committee recommended Thursday.

"Disclosure is really intended to punish those living here now," said Don Fogt, one of several residents at the meeting who opposed a recommendation from consultants to require the airport's proximity be disclosed.

"It won't do anything to fix the noise problem. All it will do is continue to affect our property values," he said.

No residents spoke out in favor of the disclosure requirement, and the advisory committee unanimously recommended against it.

"You shouldn't have to disclose the proximity to the airport. It's obvious," said Bill Frondorf, a committee member who is also a real estate agent. "Where do you draw the line?"

Jennifer Atkisson-Lovett, president of the Realtor Association of Martin County, said real estate agents are now required to disclose only defects with a piece of property that are not readily evident to the buyer. Proximity to the airport is evident, she said.

Neighbors of Witham Field have complained about pollution and noise caused by jets flying overhead, and several have sued the county.

Requiring disclosure or even publishing ads in local newspapers showing the areas affected by noise could help the county defend itself if people who were told about airport noise before they moved in later decide to sue, said Lisa Waters, the consultant studying the airport's noise issues for the county.

Disclosures also could discourage suits, Waters said. If the size of the area affected by noise later expands, those in the new noise zone may have claims against the county, she said.

But committee member and Stuart Commissioner Carol Waxler said she has a problem with anything that takes away a resident's right to sue.

"That's part of our basic rights as U.S. citizens," Waxler said.

The county commission will have the final vote on whether to require disclosures near the airport.

The committee also will make a recommendation at a later meeting on whether Stuart and the county should change zoning laws to prohibit new homes around the airport.

~



News stories provided by third parties are not edited by "Site Publication" staff. For suggestions and comments, please click the Contact link at the bottom of this page.

We Recommend

  • News

    CUT RUNWAY WITHOUT FAA, RESIDENTS SAY

    Frustration over the fight to shorten Witham Field airport's main runway bubbled over Thursday into calls by residents for a revolt against the federal government that is blocking the...

  • News

    Debate Rises Over Expanse of Livermore Airport

    With some worried it might scare away businesses and hurt property values, debate is surfacing over just how big an area should be put into a new Livermore Municipal Airport noise and safety zone.

  • News

    Alameda Airport-Area Disclosure Talks Delayed

    The city's Airport Advisory Commission will be asked to postpone, pending legal review, further discussion of how much land around the municipal airport should come under a new state law about...

  • News

    WITHAM HANGAR DECISION PUT OFF

    Faced with an almost certain denial of its request to expand hangars, a Witham Field aircraft business agreed to put off for six months plans to expand its operations. Martin County...