Technician Certification

Aug. 28, 2008
Is this a good thing? Is it necessary? If so, why? Who or which group should establish the certification process and why? Is there a better method? What exactly do you think is being attempted? Are the existing programs of recognition adequate? Etc.   The above are all questions that are on the forefront in the general aviation maintenance community. I do not know of any efforts along these lines for air or regional carrier mx ops.   There are several organizations that are attempting to establish certain standards that, when achieved, will attest to a technician's capability and knowledge. The reason for this blog is to find out what you think about this.   Some background: For years many A&Ps have not been content with their place in the aviation hierarchy. This is especially noted when salaries, career opportunities and management decisions are discussed. One of the explanations given goes back in history to WWII when pilots were officers and the mx personnel enlisted. This structure carried over to the beginnings of general aviation and air carrier ops and some say continues to this day.   As such maintenance associations like AMTSociety, PAMA/SAE, NCATT and NBAA are working on programs that will raise the recognition and the level of importance for those technicians that have evidenced the attainment of certain standards. Additionally, training organizations like FlightSafety have a Master Technician path that recognizes levels of accomplishment in training.   What do you think about this? Are these efforts something you support? Are you willing to devote the time and resources necessary to achieve levels of certification?   Or do you believe another type of effort would achieve more. For instance, I have heard many say there should be a type rating system in place similar to Canada and Europe enhancing harmony and that the 147 curriculum should be changed to accommodate this new path. Of course this will require regulatory change and that is difficult. But if it is a preferred path our leaders should be made aware.   AMT is interested in what you think. We look forward to your input.