FAA Issues a Proposed Policy ...
... on residential  through-the-fence (RTTF) operations and once it is published in the Federal  Register the industry has 45 days to comment. Considering the volatility of  the issue, the agency is likely anticipating an array of comments.
In late 2009 I wrote a blog  on this topic after FAA had offered RTTF guidance as it studied the need for  new policy. That generated quite a bit of interest including from FAA, which  led to an interview with Randall Fiertz, director of airport compliance and field  operations at the agency, who related that “there has been no change on FAA  policy on this since at least the 1980s.”
He added, “There are a couple  of reasons why we don’t like through-the-fence residential. One is, we’ve had  cases where we’ve seen that a through-the-fence agreement undermines the future  capacity capability of the airport, where certain rights have been given in  perpetuity or for very long periods of time. It may be a taxiway for the  through-the-fence agreement that blocks airport development. We’ve seen  residential hangars go up in places where it actually blocked the line of sight  from the tower.”
In response to FAA’s proposed  policy, the National Air Transportation Association issued the following  statement in a regulatory report: “NATA agrees with the FAA that the primary  issue surrounding RTTF access is the future utility of federally funded  airports. Investments in airports, made through the Airport Improvement Program  or through federal surplus property grants, are intended to enhance the  flexibility of airports to meet the future needs, in both capacity and type of  operations, of the National Airspace System. Due to the intrinsic nature of  residential properties, as compared to commercial properties, RTTF agreements  limit the flexibility of airport sponsors to meet future needs.  NATA  believes that the FAA has made an overwhelming case for prohibiting new RTTF  agreements and supports this proposal.”
Meanwhile,  ThroughtheFence.org, created to highlight the issue, on its website states,  “The short version is that they [FAA] propose allowing all current agreements  but no new ones after the effective date of the policy.” 
The proposed policy is Docket  No. FAA-2010-0831, available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-22095.pdf.  
Thanks for reading. jfi
Sponsored
Sponsored