The Responsibility of Q.C.
The Responsibility of Q.C.
From the refinery to preflight, fuel must be continually monitored
By Vern Triebel, Quality Control Director, Phillips 66 Aviation
October 2000
Teaching safety and quality control measures reduces the odds against
the possibility of human error during aircraft
refueling, and helps FBO line managers to
reevaluate their own programs in the interest of safer operations.
Every act that moves a private aircraft
into the world of flight is the responsibility of the fixed base operator
(FBO), the fuel supplier, or the pilot. In the case of aviation fuel safety,
all three must take active steps to ensure quality control measures are
being taken at different points in the process.
Quality checks are imperative after the
fuel has been produced at the supplier’s terminal, when it is delivered
to the FBO, after it has been added to the FBO’s fuel tanks, and
of course, when it is pumped into an aircraft.
TAKING RESPONSIBILIT FOR QUALITY
To maintain consistent performance standards
with all refined fuels, oil companies supplying the general aviation market
strictly adhere to internal audits on fuel quality as well as work closely
with each of their FBO outlets to adhere to quality standards and promote
safety in handling fuels. This includes teams of experts who travel to
FBOs to inspect fueling equipment, test fuel quality, and reinforce with
FBO management the preventive maintenance and field testing steps necessary
to maintain safe fueling operations.
Often, the job of "line technician"
is an entry-level, high-turnover position. This means that in the sensitive
area of fueling, the person in charge of the fueling of a multimillion
dollar jet has a great deal of responsibility.
With this reality, the importance of ensuring
that FBOs are being supplied with clean, dry fuel, and that the fuel is
maintained properly on-site cannot be overstated.
Oil companies help FBOs manage this risk
by offering line training programs in the form of literature, videos,
and seminars, often free of charge. The responsibility for well-trained,
reliable line technicians, however, rests with the FBO. Line managers
and personnel need information to strengthen existing fuel quality control
programs, run safer operations, and reduce the possibility of human error
which can be a factor when it comes to a fueling mishap.
Take, for example, the FBO that accepted
a transport shipment of what was believed to be avgas even though the
line manager hadn’t scheduled a delivery. The transport driver was
told to off-load the fuel without anyone at the FBO first checking the
paperwork.
Once at the fuel farm, a line technician
also failed to check delivery paperwork before connecting the hose and
accepted the fuel without first doing a "clear and bright" white
bucket test.
Fortunately, the line manager arrived before
the first drop was pumped into the fuel farm. The line manager checked
the paperwork and discovered not only that the shipment was meant for
another FBO, but that it was jet fuel rather than 100LL avgas. Had the
paperwork been properly examined — or, failing that, had the white
bucket test been administered — the line technician would have known
immediately that something was wrong.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »
Do you recommend this Article?
We Recommend
-
Company
Phillips 66 Aviation
-
Article
Aviation's Hidden Threat
-
Article
Everything Fine ... 'Til Takeoff
-
Article
Supervisor Training
NATA course focuses on safety, effective management of line operations






