Regulators Target Hazmat
Regulators Target Hazmat
Inspections, fines on the rise as federal agencies increase scrutiny
By John Boyce, Contributing Editor
March 2001
If
you’ve noticed an increase in FAA surveillance and enforcement of
hazardous materials transportation rules, you’re seeing part of the
agency’s response to the crash of ValuJet Flight 592 in May 1996.
"It’s actually a whole new revitalized
dangerous goods and cargo security program prompted by the ValuJet accident,’’
says Rebecca Trexler, a public affairs spokesperson for the FAA, in response
to a question about an apparent increase in FAA enforcement of the Department
of Transportation rules for transporting hazardous materials.
In a Fact Sheet, the FAA explains further,
"Today, the FAA is examining virtually every aspect of the transportation
of dangerous goods by air. Focused inspections done in coordination with
the Postal Service, the Customs Service, the Research and Special Program
Administration (RSPA) and other Department of Transportation offices,
have increased awareness of the seriousness with which the FAA is actively
pursuing persons and companies who fail to comply with the dangerous goods
regulations."
Bill Spohrer, president and CEO of Challenge
Cargo Airlines in Miami, attests to the FAA’s increased surveillance.
"FAA inspectors make more frequent surprise inspections,’’
Spohrer says, "and they’re more stringent than in the past.
They’re absolutely right, you can’t take chances with this stuff.
"They (FAA) try to work with you. It’s
not a confrontational situation. The idea is not to punish you; the idea
is to get the procedure correct —although they have no hesitation
about whacking you with a fine."
The FAA reports that since 1997 it has inspected
770 repair stations, 1,369 shippers of dangerous goods, and conducted
7,452 assessments of air carriers and indirect air carriers. This effort
has resulted in more than $14 million in fines. And tellingly, "The
fines do not necessarily mean more violations are occurring, but rather
that the FAA now has a greater ability to uncover and respond to violations."
The cause of the ValuJet crash in the Florida
Everglades was found to be a fire sparked by oxygen generators in the
cargo hold of the aircraft. SabreTech, the company that shipped the generators,
was later held criminally liable for that shipment.
That fact alone was enough to get the attention
of the aviation industry, irrespective of what the FAA subsequently did,
according to Jason Dickstein, general counsel for the Airline Suppliers
Association (ASA) in Washington.
"There has been an increase in the
enforcement by the FAA," Dickstein says, "but even if there
hadn’t been, I think the SabreTech criminal actions would have been
enough to turn people’s heads. Even without the enforcement you would
see an awful lot more attention paid to hazmat training and hazmat quality
systems."
- « Previous Page
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »
Do you recommend this Article?
We Recommend
-
Article
ValuJet Postscript: give a statement . . . go to jail
ValuJet Postscript Give a statement...go to jail By Stephen P. Prentice October 1999 Stephen P. Prentice is an attorney whose practice involves FAA-NTSB issues. He has an...
-
Press Release
FAA Proposes $689,800 Civil Penalty Against Federal Express
FAA alleges 89 instances FedEx failed to provide pilots with complete information on materials loaded on aircraft.
-
Article
Working with the FAA: A look at the enforcement process
Around The Hangar Working With The FAA A look at the enforcement process By Joe Hertzler October 2004 Joe Hertzler As I think about the aviation...
-
Press Release
Low-fare Airlines, Ten Years After the Crash of ValuJet Flight 592
Low-fare airlines aren't just cheaper. They also are less prone to mishandle baggage, have slightly better on-time records and have about the same accident rates as major airlines, according to a...






