Commercializing U.S. ATC
Commercializing U.S. ATC
Think-tank reviews alternatives to a government-operated system
By Robert W. Poole, Jr., & Viggo Butler, Reason Public Policy Institute
April 2001
In February, the Reason Public Policy Institute released its latest study, "How to Commercialize Air Traffic Control." Specifically, the group looked at alternatives the U.S. might consider as it seeks to modernize its current system. Following is an edited transcript of the think-tank’s executive summary, and lessons to be learned from the Canadian experience.
Over the past 15 years, nearly two dozen
countries have corporatized their air traffic control systems, including
Australia, Canada, Ger-many, Ireland, New Zealand, South Africa, Switzerland,
Thailand, and the United Kingdom. All of these ATC corporations operate
on commercial principles, to a far greater extent than do typical U.S.
government corporations (such as Amtrak, U.S. Postal Service, the Tennessee
Valley Author-ity). At a minimum, these commercial principles include
the following:
• Keeping their books in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;
• Being governed by a corporate-type
board of directors;
• Borrowing from the private capital
market;
• Supporting themselves via fees charged
to users.
The International Civil Aviation Organization
(ICAO) has long supported ATC corporatization, which it terms the creation
of autonomous authorities (with) greater freedom from the government in
conducting its financial affairs. Importantly, it should still be regulated
by the government.
A Stretched System
The record levels of air traffic delays
in the summers of 1999 and 2000 have revealed an air traffic control (ATC)
system stretched beyond its limits. And not only are delays at record
levels; so, too are runway incursions and operational errors by controllers.
Over the past decade a growing consensus
has emerged that air traffic control is essentially a commercial service,
a 24-hour-a-day, seven-day-a-week, high-tech service business. A number
of federal task forces and commissions have, accordingly, recommended
that ATC be separated from the Federal Aviation Adminis-tration (FAA)
and set up as some kind of corporate entity, funded directly by payments
from users.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »
We Recommend
-
News
AOPA Endorses House FAA Funding Bill
No User Fees, More Money for ATC and Airports
-
Article
Airports at a Crossroad
-
Article
ATC - A Balanced Perspective
-
News
U.S. Aviation Industry Debates Funding
Airlines are clashing with general aviation companies over who's driving the costs and who has to pay the bill for using the nation's aviation system.






