Cautious Projections
• Airlines will move away from ownership
in their feeder carriers, either assimilating the operations into the
major or allowing the feeder airline to stand alone. This should help
resolve the labor disputes among pilot unions regarding disparate salaries,
as witnessed after American’s acquisition of Reno Air.
• Airports will find that they will
need to do their homework when it comes to demonstrating to a carrier
that theirs is a high yield market. At the same time, attracting new air
service will become very difficult in the short term. That includes Southwest,
says Boyd, which will become more select in adding cities to serve. "Southwest
won’t do another Jackson (MS)," he predicts.
• While some smaller airports will
see frequency or entire carrier service cut, there are some bright spots,
says Boyd. Airports that serve isolated communities situated far from
a hub should not see any significant cuts in carrier service. At the same
time, airports in communities that have strong business ties to the global
community, such as Peoria and the Quad Cities-Moline, IL, should be able
to weather the cutbacks.
• Airports in Phoenix, Burlington,
VT, and other high economic growth communities should continue to see
strong air service.
• Essential Air Service (EAS) communities
that are served by 19-seat aircraft will have difficulty retaining air
service. The EAS program, he says, needs to be entirely revamped. "We
need a real subsidy for places that really need it," he says.
• The U.S. carriers will begin to shift
the fleet makeup to the new 70- to 100-seat aircraft, a primary reason
being fuel efficiency. In the short term, however, the smaller regional
jets will continue to have a major impact, particularly to smaller communities,
continuing a trend of recent years. Long term, Boyd sees the smaller RJs
being phased out. And, while recognizing that there is a market for the
super-jumbo Airbus-380 now under development, he does not see demand justifying
cost for developing the aircraft and sees the project putting Airbus in
economic jeopardy.
• There will be little new airline
entrant activity. "Friends don’t let friends start airlines,"
says Boyd.
Boyd says that the recent financial aid
package to the carriers by Congress was necessary, and cautions that airline
bankruptcies could still be on the horizon. In particular, he questions
the viability of United Airlines, whose CEO was recently quoted as saying
the company faced possible bankruptcy in 2002.
The analyst also calls for airport associations
and other industry groups to speak out and stand up to FAA, cautioning
that they may be too close to the politics of major issues. FAA, he says,
is incompetent.
Biometrics, and Consensus on Security
John Cockerham, president of TouchSafe International of Huntsville, AL, and David Forbes, CEO of Denver-based Quo Vadis International Security, told The Boyd Group conference that biometric identification techniques are an answer for better security
at U.S. airports. And, both say it’s time to look outside industry
for input.
According to Cockerham, security-related
reactions at airports following September 11 have been long on perception
and short on reality. The current system calls for finding an undesirable
object to be able to identify an undesirable person. "That’s
got to change," he says.
Cockerham sees biometrics as playing
a key role toward improving security by identifying the passenger
by way of a personal ID card that can be plugged into the airport
system upon check-in. He calls for bringing together the various technological
advances in fingerprint biometrics, facial geometry, voice recognition,
and stress screening.
Radio frequency identification (RFID)
tracking would then be used to follow the passenger through the airport
and onto the aircraft. Luggage, meanwhile, will have similar RFID
tags that tie directly to the specific customer, and be able to be
tracked through the system as well.
Cockerham calls for creating an aviation
security task force that would have representatives from an airline,
an airport, operations, the technology sector, along with $5 million
in seed money. Possible solutions would then be tested onsite at the
participating airport.
Forbes, an Englishman, says Europeans
have been dismayed by U.S. security inaction since the 1988 bombing
of Pan Am 103. Specifically, he says the U.S. has suffered from regulatory
confusion, predictability of weaknesses, poor accountability, low-skilled
manpower, and a cost mindset, among other deficiencies.
He calls for public-private think tanks,
federal supervision by a newly created agency, and firm Administration
support. Forbes also sees a need for publication of a security rating
for every airport, with stringent control penalties imposed on "insecure"
airports. He also calls for biometric identification, which he deems
essential for airside access.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »
We Recommend
-
Article
Brighter Days for the Carriers
-
Article
Report: Jet Fuel Conference
-
Article
Hubs, Access, Connectivity
-
Article
Slow to Grow, With Less Risk: Airports, scrambling over security, now face a different airline industry.
by John F. Infanger , Editorial Director SARASOTA, FL – It will be several years before the U.S. airline industry returns to traffic levels seen in 2000, according to analysts speaking...






