Major challenges remain, but the potential exists for a renaissance
by J.E. Murdock
J.E. ’Sandy’ MurdockAbout the Author J.E. ’Sandy’ Murdock serves as a partner in the Aviation Law Group of Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge, based in Washington, D.C. A specialist in regulatory aviation affairs, he is the former chief counsel for the Federal Aviation Administration.Free flight, as a concept, will be tested in the next year. If it succeeds, new entrepreneurs will enter the system. Fractional ownership will be supplemented by a new regulatory reality. Small airports, a convenience to the traveling public, with the amenities and ease of movement demanded by passengers, will be the new critical structures. All of this depends on visions becoming reality. We will know soon.
If the promises are realized, be ready; the market will move with expedition. The entities that are able to respond to this new technology will capture the passengers of the second sea change since deregulation. Eyes open, nimble feet, quick response will dictate the "dotcom" like growth of the new generation of aviation. Excitement like we have never seen since early aviation. Meanwhile, some challenges exist.
August 31, 2002 marks the end of an era — the end of the first fixed fiveyear term for an FAA Administrator. Rumor has it that the White House has not yet begun to look for a successor to Jane Garvey. Thus, it may be timely to consider what the industry needs in an Administrator.
The FAA’s top job requires someone who knows the business. It’s important that the candidate be able to ask the right questions about the engineering analysis for an A380 or a Sonic Cruiser, need not rely on a senior career staffer to assess the validity of a pilot’s complaint about diurnal rhythm, assess aerial navigation systems so that the Administrator can tell the DOT Secretary that free flight will work, and so on. The person must have the history of participating in comparable decisions in the past and a background with which to assess the quality of the work product.
We need someone who can deal with the political technocrat connection. The job of the Secretary is to assess the will of Congress or to accept directives from the White House. The job of the Administrator is to take those political orders and to translate them to terms, to a vocabulary, that the career staff can accept.
The typical FAA employee who accepts the agency’s mission to promote aviation safety will be uncomfortable with blatant, political orders. The Administrator has to be able to translate such directives into terms that can be digested by the staff.
FAA career employees are in a state of disarray. Every President since 1976 has been elected on a platform that the Washington bureaucracy is inept, illmotivated. It is becoming a selffilling prophesy.
FAA staff is made up of a very dedicated and knowledgeable crew. What they lack is confidence, and their low selfesteem can be redressed by a leader who has the technical skill set, the political platform, and personal traits to reassure that, left to its technical mission, FAA can do its job.
BEWARE THE EASA
Those who have followed recent relationships between FAA and the civil aviation authorities of Europe must be aware of the rising European threat. Strange certification processes for Boeing or Gulfstream, curious rules proposed for pilots trained in the U.S., and the infamous hush kit rules — to cite a few examples — evidence the growing aggression of the European countries against the historical dominance of U.S. aviation products and regulations.
The U.S. has been successful in rebuffing such initiatives because Europe has not been unified. While there is an EU and a JAA, there have been multiple civil aviation authorities (CAA, LBA, DGAC, FOCA, etc.). Those fissures will soon be rectified.
EASA, the European Aviation Safety Administration, will become a reality soon and will be a threat to the preeminence of FAA. A Eurocrat writing rules with global impact will impact U.S. flight schools, will hurt sales of Boeing products, will redefine ATC rules to favor the technology of Swedish companies, etc. EASA will become the number one threat to the U.S. and FAA has no substantive basis to object to its creation.
Knowledge of fatigue hazards can become clouded by the necessity of meeting deadlines, fulfilling delivery promises, or pocketing some extra overtime wages.
In a continuing effort to address aging aircraft issues, the FAA has finalized a rule designed to protect most of today’s commercial planes and those designed in the future from structural damage as...
The Boeing 787-8 has become the first Boeing passenger aircraft with an entirely new type design to be certified by EASA since the Agency’s creation in 2003.
The EASA POA confirms an organisation’s ability to manufacture aviation products according to European safety standards.