ATOS will get more focus because the report recommends a time and motion study of its frontline inspection operations to determine the time demands of ATOS (and the other IT programs). FAA management should finally realize that the time demands of all these data collection programs do not give the frontline inspectors much time for anything else.
It does not seem possible for field inspectors to collect, collate, and analyze all the data that is collected (much less their managers). It is becoming more apparent that the field inspectors do not have the time to do all the work. The time and motion study should show this. It seems to me to be a no brainer!
Send your comments to firstname.lastname@example.org.
U.S. Secretary of Transportation Mary E. Peters Announces New Steps to Improve FAA's Aviation Safety Program
An independent review team provides 13 recommended improvements to FAA safety programs.
The Inspector General of the Department of Transportation has recently published, without fanfare, its report stating that the ATOS safety program started in 1998 has failed in its effort to implement...
Advisory Circular AC 00-58 Self-Disclosure Legal quagmire or is confession good for the soul? By Stephen P. Prentice July 1999 Stephen P. Prentice is an attorney whose practice...
NASIP's Last Gasp National Aviation Safety Inspection Program — gone with the wind By Stephen P. Prentice September 1999 Stephen P. Prentice is an attorney whose practice...