By Paul A. Esposito
Safety audits (assessments) can rate an organization’s total safety and health program, identify its strengths and weaknesses, show where improvements are needed and create a process and procedure by which problems can be corrected. In addition to assessing safety violations and work conditions, some audits assess senior management’s philosophy and attitude toward safety.
The three types of safety audits that evaluate these practices are referred to as compliance, programs, and management system audits.
The most basic audit is a compliance or condition inspection. OSHA does not specifically require that companies conduct safety and health audits but OSHA regulations are written such that employers must furnish their employees with a place of employment free from recognized hazards and comply with certain standards. Management then develops programs to comply with certain standards, rules, and regulations. In addition, compliance requirements dictate certain record-keeping, programs, and training requirements. A true compliance audit will look at all three factors — conformance, record-keeping, and training.
A safety audit based on OSHA compliance will determine whether the company can provide a safe and healthful workplace. But this audit on its own tends to focus more on unsafe conditions rather than unsafe acts and behaviors. However, the majority of accidents occur from unsafe acts, i.e., you can have a wet floor (unsafe condition), but an injury may not occur until someone walks on the wet floor and slips (unsafe act). It is impossible to have a workplace free from unsafe conditions all of the time, because conditions and people change and the potential that someone will create unsafe conditions is always present.
To achieve a goal of reducing accidents and incidents as well as unsafe acts and conditions which result in accidents, you must have programs in place that dictate how to implement safety rules or requirements. An example of a regulatory requirement is to record accidents on an OSHA 300 log and to do so within six days. A program requirement would describe the method one would use to investigate the accident. OSHA, while providing suggestions for investigating an accident, does not regulate how to investigate. So it is up to the company to define and write down the procedure for investigating the accident in order to implement the safety rule or requirement and to make it meaningful. Having done so, the company now has a safety program in place for the procedure.
A program audit is an analysis that gauges the implementation and strategy of these safety programs. Is the company following its own procedures and programs?
One drawback to a program audit is determining what to use as a standard. There is plenty of guidance but not much consistency in professional practice when it comes to what should be included. There are some fundamentals, however. For one, it is essential that all procedures are written down. This documents the communication of the hazard as well as the procedures for minimizing exposure and allows the procedure to be checked, measured, and or audited. If unsafe acts create unsafe conditions, you need a program to communicate how to stop doing those things.
One challenge is that keeping safety programs current requires being able to manage change. New facilities, equipment, and personnel (i.e., change in shift hours if it means an increase in workers’ exposure time) require changes in safety programs.
Both the compliance and program audits are useful snapshots to indicate potential exposures and risks. The value of these audits is to find the safety gaps so they can be closed. Another value is to verify if people are really following established safety guidelines. But an audit that is conducted only once a year is limited if there is no ongoing process by which to measure how often and how well employees are using and following safety programs.
The basics of implementing safety measures into the workplace.
Commitment is key to keeping your workplace safer
The Audit Advantage Quality system auditing can improve safety, operational integrity By Louis A. Sorrentino III, Vice President, SH&E June 2001 The practice of quality system...